One Sixth Warriors Forum banner
1 - 2 of 2 Posts

·
aka haloed
Joined
·
1,553 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
Just like the question implies. I watched the new andromada strain on A&E the other night I know that Ridley Scott and his brother Tony were producers. I thought it was kinda blah looking considering who was producing. Could they have not put certain people in place that would ensure the look of the film. I thought the lighting was off as well as the cinamatography. Now what I want to know is who has a say in the way shots are set up, camera placement, lighting? Look at the new Battlestar Galactica. It's a tv show and looks better than most of the movies that are in theaters today. Are people responsible for the look of television different from film?
 

·
aka haloed
Joined
·
1,553 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
Money and how well they can suck the chrome off a trailer hitch.

I work in advertising, unfortunately it has a lot to do with who you know not what you know.
:fit, as with all things the previous statement is true. so the director is has no real responsibility for the look?
 
1 - 2 of 2 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top